Kontribusi Digitalisasi Proses Kerja dan Teknologi Kinerja terhadap Efisiensi Organisasi

Authors

  • Nurul Fidayati Program Studi Teknologi Pendidikan, Universitas PGRI Adi Buana Surabaya, Indonesia.
  • Nia Lusanawati Program Studi Teknologi Pendidikan, Universitas PGRI Adi Buana Surabaya, Indonesia.
  • Chulwatun Chasanah Program Studi Teknologi Pendidikan, Universitas PGRI Adi Buana Surabaya, Indonesia.
  • Sabariah Sabariah Program Studi Teknologi Pendidikan, Universitas PGRI Adi Buana Surabaya, Indonesia.
  • Hartono Hartono Program Studi Teknologi Pendidikan, Universitas PGRI Adi Buana Surabaya, Indonesia.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52436/1.jpti.2022

Keywords:

digitalisasi proses kerja, efisiensi organisasi, regresi, teknologi kinerja

Abstract

Digitalisasi proses kerja dapat mempercepat alur kerja, memperbaiki dokumentasi, memperkuat koordinasi, dan meningkatkan akses data. Namun, manfaat tersebut perlu dikaitkan dengan teknologi kinerja agar digitalisasi tidak hanya menjadi penggunaan aplikasi, tetapi juga intervensi untuk meningkatkan efisiensi organisasi. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis hubungan digitalisasi proses kerja dan teknologi kinerja dengan efisiensi organisasi. Metode penelitian menggunakan survei kuantitatif terhadap 100 respo nden lintas unit kerja. Instrumen menggunakan skala Likert 1 –5 yang terdiri atas 10 butir digitalisasi proses kerja, 8 butir teknologi kinerja, dan 10 butir efisiensi organisasi. Data dianalisis melalui statistik deskriptif, uji reliabilitas Cronbach Alpha, korelasi Pearson, regresi linear sederhana, dan regresi linear berganda. Hasil menunjukkan rata -rata digitalisasi proses kerja sebesar 3,592, teknologi kinerja 3,490, dan efisiensi organisasi 3,637. Seluruh instrumen reliabel dengan nilai Cronbach Alpha 0,829–0,914. Digitalisasi proses kerja berkorelasi positif dengan efisiensi organisasi (r = 0,687; p < 0,001), demikian pula teknologi kinerja (r = 0,585; p < 0,001). Regresi berganda menunjukkan digitalisasi proses kerja dan teknologi kinerja menjelaskan 51,2% variasi efisiensi organisasi. Temuan ini menegaskan bahwa efisiensi organisasi meningkat ketika digitalisasi dipadukan dengan analisis kebutuhan, pelatihan, monitoring, umpan balik, dan evaluasi berkelanjutan.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

G. Vial, “Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda,” Journal of Strategic Information Systems, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 118–144, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.jsis.2019.01.003.

P. C. Verhoef et al., “Digital transformation: A multidisciplinary reflection and research agenda,” Journal of Business Research, vol. 122, pp. 889–901, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.09.022.

S. Kraus et al., “Digital transformation: An overview of the current state of the art of research,” SAGE Open, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 1–15, 2021, doi: 10.1177/21582440211047576.

N. Alsufyani and A. Q. Gill, “Digitalisation performance assessment: A systematic review,” Technology in Society, vol. 68, art. no. 101894, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.101894.

M. Cosa and R. Torelli, “Digital transformation and flexible performance management: A systematic literature review of the evolution of performance measurement systems,” Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 445–466, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s40171-024-00409-9.

M. Dumas, M. La Rosa, J. Mendling, and H. A. Reijers, Fundamentals of Business Process Management, 2nd ed. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 2018.

J. vom Brocke, T. Schmiedel, J. Recker, P. Trkman, W. Mertens, and S. Viaene, “Ten principles of good business process management,” Business Process Management Journal, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 530 –548, 2014, doi: 10.1108/BPMJ-06-2013-0074.

J. vom Brocke, J. Mendling, and M. Rosemann, Business Process Management Cases: Digital Innovation and Business Transformation in Practice. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2018, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-58307-5.

D. M. Van Tiem, J. L. Moseley, and J. C. Dessinger, Fundamentals of Performance Improvement: Optimizing Results through People, Process, and Organizations, 3rd ed. San Francisco, CA, USA: Pfeiffer, 2012. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Teknologi Indonesia (JPTI) p-ISSN: 2775-4227 e-ISSN: 2775-4219 2353

J. A. Pershing, Handbook of Human Performance Technology: Principles, Practices, and Potential, 3rd ed. San Francisco, CA, USA: Pfeiffer, 2006.

B. Trenerry et al., “Preparing workplaces for digital transformation: An integrative review and framework of multi - level factors,” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 12, art. no. 620766, 2021, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.620766.

C. Marsh, J. Vallejos, and S. Spence, “The digital workplace and its dark side: An integrative review,” Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 128, art. no. 107118, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2021.107118.

L. Yang et al., “The effects of remote work on collaboration among information workers,” Nature Human Behaviour, vol. 6, pp. 43–54, 2022, doi: 10.1038/s41562-021-01196-4.

S. Chatterjee, R. Chaudhuri, D. Vrontis, and G. Giovando, “Digital workplace and organization performance: Moderating role of digital leadership capability,” Journal of Innovation and Knowledge, vol. 8, no. 1, art. no. 100334, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.jik.2023.100334.

C. Bai, M. Quayson, and J. Sarkis, “COVID-19 pandemic digitization lessons for sustainable development of micro- and small -enterprises,” Sustainable Production and Consumption, vol. 27, pp. 1989 –2001, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.spc.2021.04.035.

S. G. Parry and V. Battista, “The impact of emerging technologies on work: A review of the evidence and implications for the human resource function,” Emerald Open Research, vol. 1, no. 5, pp. 1 –20, 2019, doi: 10.12688/emeraldopenres.12907.1.

S. Appel-Meulenbroek, R. Kemperman, and T. van der Voordt, “Workplace digitalization and workload: Changes and reciprocal relations,” Scientific Reports, vol. 14, art. no. 56537, 2024, doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-56537-w.

A. M. Elia, M. G. Margherita, and G. Secundo, “Digital transformation readiness: An exploratory study,” Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 3283 –3304, 2024, doi: 10.3390/jtaer19040159.

B. Audrin, C. Audrin, and X. Salamin, “Digital skills at work: Conceptual development and empirical validation of a measurement scale,” Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 202, art. no. 123279, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123279.

J. W. Creswell and J. D. Creswell, Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, 5th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: SAGE, 2018.

F. Li, “The relationship between digital transformation and organisational efficiency in China: The mediating role of information disclosure,” SAGE Open, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 1–19, 2025, doi: 10.1177/21582440251360487.

M. Rubio -Andrés, J. Linuesa -Langreo, S. Gutiérrez -Broncano, and M. Á. Sastre -Castillo, “Tackling digital transformation strategy: How it affects firm innovation and organizational effectiveness,” The Journal of Technology Transfer, vol. 50, pp. 1893–1918, 2025, doi: 10.1007/s10961-024-10164-9.

S. Adomako and N. P. Nguyen, “Digitalization, inter -organizational collaboration, and technology transfer,” The Journal of Technology Transfer, vol. 49, pp. 1176–1202, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s10961-023-10031-z.

Published

2026-10-27

How to Cite

Fidayati, N., Lusanawati, N., Chasanah, C., Sabariah, S., & Hartono, H. (2026). Kontribusi Digitalisasi Proses Kerja dan Teknologi Kinerja terhadap Efisiensi Organisasi. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Teknologi Indonesia, 6(10), 2348-2353. https://doi.org/10.52436/1.jpti.2022