Analisis Empiris Kualitas Butir Soal Penilaian Sumatif Mata Pelajaran Desain Komunikasi Visual Berbasis Evaluasi Pembelajaran di SMK Negeri 1 Mojokerto
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52436/1.jpti.1837Keywords:
analisis butir soal, daya pembeda, desain komunikasi visual, evaluasi pembelajaran, tingkat kesukaran, validitasAbstract
Kualitas instrumen evaluasi memiliki peranan penting dalam menentukan tingkat akurasi pengukuran hasil belajar peserta didik. Namun, dalam praktiknya masih ditemukan penyusunan soal yang belum melalui proses analisis empiris sehingga validitas dan kualitas pengukuran belum optimal. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis kualitas butir soal Penilaian Sumatif Akhir Semester (PSAS) pada mata pelajaran Desain Komunikasi Visual (DKV) di SMK Negeri 1 Mojokerto. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif deskriptif dengan teknik analisis butir soal terhadap 30 soal pilihan ganda. Analisis dilakukan menggunakan perangkat lunak Anates Versi 4.0.9 dengan mengkaji aspek validitas, tingkat kesukaran, daya pembeda, dan efektivitas distraktor. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa sebanyak 20 butir soal (66,7%) dinyatakan valid, sedangkan 10 butir soal (33,3%) belum memenuhi kriteria validitas. Tingkat kesukaran didominasi kategori sedang (60%), sedangkan daya pembeda mayoritas berada pada kategori cukup hingga baik (83,3%). Analisis distraktor menunjukkan bahwa sebagian besar pengecoh telah berfungsi secara efektif, meskipun beberapa opsi jawaban masih memerlukan perbaikan. Temuan penelitian mengindikasikan bahwa instrumen evaluasi secara umum telah memenuhi karakteristik tes yang baik, namun revisi diperlukan pada beberapa butir soal yang belum optimal. Hasil penelitian ini dapat dimanfaatkan sebagai dasar pengembangan bank soal dan peningkatan kompetensi guru dalam menyusun instrumen evaluasi yang valid, objektif, dan berkualitas pada pendidikan vokasi khususnya bidang Desain Komunikasi Visual.
Downloads
References
D. Mardapi, Pengukuran, Penilaian, dan Evaluasi Pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Parama Publishing, 2020.
A. Sudijono, Pengantar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada, 2022.
E. Winther and F. Achtenhagen, “Measurement of Vocational Competencies—A Contribution to an International Large-Scale Assessment on Vocational Education and Training,” Empirical Research in Vocational Education and Training, 2009.
M. Nurtanto, Z. Arifin, and H. Sofyan, “Development of Model for Professional Competency Assessment (PCA) in Vocational Education,” Journal of Technical Education and Training, 2020.
H. Retnawati, Analisis Kuantitatif Instrumen Penelitian. Yogyakarta: Parama Publishing, 2021.
N. Kholis, B. Kartowagiran, and D. Mardapi, “Development and Validation of an Instrument to Measure a Performance of Vocational High School,” European Journal of Educational Research, 2020.
Z. Arifin, Evaluasi Pembelajaran: Prinsip, Teknik, dan Prosedur. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya, 2021.
D. Mardapi, Pengukuran, Penilaian, dan Evaluasi Pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Parama Publishing, 2020.
A. Z. Fathin and H. Retnawati, “How Good Are the Characteristics of the Mathematics National Standardized School Examination Items in Vocational School?,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1581, 2020.
L. Greenstein, Assessing 21st Century Skills: A Guide to Evaluating Mastery and Authentic Learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press, 2012.
P. Sukkeewan, N. Songkram, and J. Nasongkhla, “Development and Validation of a Reliable and Valid Assessment Tool for Measuring Innovative Thinking in Vocational Students,” Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 2024.
H. Retnawati, Analisis Kuantitatif Instrumen Penelitian. Yogyakarta: Parama Publishing, 2021.
N. Kholis, B. Kartowagiran, and D. Mardapi, “Development and Validation of an Instrument to Measure a Performance of Vocational High School,” European Journal of Educational Research, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 955–966, 2020.
H. Maksum, D. Yuvenda, and W. Purwanto, “Teaching Factory Based on Troubleshooting (TEFA-T) Model to Improve Problem-Solving and Critical Thinking Skills in Vocational Learning,” Journal of Turkish Science Education, 2022.
D. Mardapi, Pengukuran, Penilaian, dan Evaluasi Pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Parama Publishing, 2020.
H. Retnawati, Analisis Kuantitatif Instrumen Penelitian. Yogyakarta: Parama Publishing, 2021.
N. Kholis, B. Kartowagiran, and D. Mardapi, “Development and Validation of an Instrument to Measure a Performance of Vocational High School,” European Journal of Educational Research, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 955–966, 2020.
M. J. Gierl, O. Bulut, and Q. Guo, “Developing, Analyzing, and Using Distractors for Multiple-Choice Tests in Education: A Comprehensive Review,” Rev. Educ. Res., vol. 87, no. 6, pp. 1082–1116, 2017, doi: 10.3102/0034654317726529.
M. Sajjad, S. Iltaf, and R. A. Khan, “Nonfunctional Distractor Analysis: An Indicator for Quality of Multiple Choice Questions,” Pak. J. Med. Sci., vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 982–986, 2020.
A. A. Rezigalla, A. M. E. S. A. Eleragi, and A. B. Elhussein, “Item Analysis: The Impact of Distractor Efficiency on the Difficulty Index and Discrimination Power of Multiple-Choice Items,” BMC Med. Educ., vol. 24, 2024.
A. Friatma and A. Anhar, “Analysis of Validity, Reliability, Discrimination, Difficulty and Distraction Effectiveness in Learning Assessment,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1387, 2019.
Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. 2022.
J. W. Creswell and J. D. Creswell, Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. 2018.
H. Retnawati, Analisis Kuantitatif Instrumen Penelitian. 2021.
H. Sutrisno, “An Analysis of the Mathematics School Examination Test Quality,” Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 195–206, 2016.
A. T. Panjaitan and H. Retnawati, “The Characteristics of Final Mathematics Test Items Based on Classical Test Theory,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1397, 2019, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1397/1/012095.
P. I. Wiyasa, I. Laksana, and N. L. K. M. Indrawati, “Evaluating Quality of Teacher-Developed English Test in Vocational High School: Content Validity and Item Analysis,” Education Quarterly Reviews, vol. 2, no. 4, 2019.
M. Suhaini, A. Ahmad, and N. M. Bohari, “Assessments on Vocational Knowledge and Skills: A Content Validity Analysis,” European Journal of Educational Research, 2021.
T. Simon, I. Biro, and A. Karpati, “Developmental Assessment of Visual Communication Skills in Primary Education,” J. Intell., vol. 10, no. 3, 2022.
T. M. Haladyna, “Item Analysis for Selected-Response Test Items,” in Handbook of Test Development, 3rd ed., Routledge, 2015.
R. K. Hambleton, H. Swaminathan, and H. J. Rogers, Fundamentals of Item Response Theory. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, 1991.
