Evaluasi Pengorganisasian Sumber Belajar Manual dan Digital dalam Pembelajaran Kimia di SMA Negeri 4 Surabaya
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52436/1.jpti.1902Kata Kunci:
Evaluasi Pembelajaran, Kimia, Pembelajaran Digital, Pengorganisasian Sumber Belajar, Sumber Belajar ManualAbstrak
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengevaluasi pengorganisasian sumber belajar manual dan digital dalam pembelajaran kimia di SMA Negeri 4 Surabaya. Fokus penelitian meliputi ketersediaan, pengelolaan, pemanfaatan, kendala, serta kebutuhan pengembangan sumber belajar. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode deskriptif dengan pendekatan kuantitatif-kualitatif. Subjek penelitian terdiri atas satu guru kimia dan 40 siswa kelas XI; data kualitatif diperkuat melalui wawancara guru, wawancara siswa, dan observasi lima sesi pembelajaran. Data angket dianalisis secara deskriptif kuantitatif menggunakan persentase, sedangkan data wawancara dan observasi dianalisis melalui reduksi data, penyajian data, dan penarikan kesimpulan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa aspek positif pengorganisasian sumber belajar berada pada kategori sangat baik, dengan rerata 82,26% setelah aspek kendala dipisahkan. Namun, jika aspek kendala diperlakukan sebagai indikator negatif dan dibalik dalam perhitungan skor keseluruhan, skor terkoreksi menjadi 78,08% dengan kategori baik. Aspek pemanfaatan sumber belajar digital memperoleh persentase tertinggi, yaitu 83,28%, sedangkan kendala penggunaan sumber belajar mencapai 74,06% dan termasuk kategori tinggi. Temuan ini menunjukkan bahwa sumber belajar manual dan digital telah mendukung pembelajaran kimia, tetapi pengelolaan, aksesibilitas, keteraturan penyimpanan, kurasi sumber digital, dan integrasi manual-digital masih perlu diperkuat. Oleh karena itu, penelitian ini merekomendasikan pengembangan bank sumber belajar kimia yang terkurasi, mudah diakses, dan tersedia dalam format manual maupun digital.
Unduhan
Referensi
ADDIN Mendeley Bibliography CSL_BIBLIOGRAPHY [1] S.-H. Wu, C.-L. Lai, G.-J. Hwang, and C.-C. Tsai, “Research Trends in Technology-Enhanced Chemistry Learning: A Review of Comparative Research from 2010 to 2019,” J. Sci. Educ. Technol., vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 496–510, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s10956-020-09894-w.
L. K. Smetana and R. L. Bell, “Computer Simulations to Support Science Instruction and Learning: A Critical Review of the Literature,” Int. J. Sci. Educ., vol. 34, no. 9, pp. 1337–1370, 2012, doi: 10.1080/09500693.2011.605182.
O. Wohlfart, A. L. Wagner, and I. Wagner, “Digital Tools in Secondary Chemistry Education: Added Value or Modern Gimmicks?,” Front. Educ., vol. 8, 2023, doi: 10.3389/feduc.2023.1197296.
P. Chan, T. Van Gerven, J.-L. Dubois, and K. Bernaerts, “Virtual Chemical Laboratories: A Systematic Literature Review of Research, Technologies and Instructional Design,” Comput. Educ. Open, vol. 2, p. 100053, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.caeo.2021.100053.
J. Huang, “Successes and Challenges: Online Teaching and Learning of Chemistry in Higher Education in China in the Time of COVID-19,” J. Chem. Educ., vol. 97, no. 9, pp. 2810–2814, 2020, doi: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00671.
E. E. Olakanmi, “The Effects of a Web-Based Computer Simulation on Students’ Conceptual Understanding of Rate of Reaction and Attitude toward Science,” J. Balt. Sci. Educ., vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 627–640, 2015, [Online]. Available: https://www.scientiasocialis.lt/jbse/?q=node/449
D. Hillmayr, L. Ziernwald, F. Reinhold, S. I. Hofer, and K. M. Reiss, “The Potential of Digital Tools to Enhance Mathematics and Science Learning in Secondary Schools: A Context-Specific Meta-Analysis,” Comput. Educ., vol. 153, p. 103897, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103897.
B. K. DeKorver, A. Chaney, and D. G. Herrington, “Strategies for Teaching Chemistry Online: A Content Analysis of a Chemistry Instruction Online Learning Community during the Time of COVID-19,” J. Chem. Educ., vol. 97, no. 9, pp. 2825–2833, 2020, doi: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00783.
S. Giri and P. Dutta, “Identifying Challenges and Opportunities in Teaching Chemistry Online in India amid COVID-19,” J. Chem. Educ., vol. 98, no. 2, pp. 694–699, 2021, doi: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00720.
M. W. Lee, “Online Teaching of Chemistry during the Period of COVID-19: Experience at a National University in Korea,” J. Chem. Educ., vol. 97, no. 9, pp. 2834–2838, 2020, doi: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00881.
S. T. Levy and U. Wilensky, “Students’ Learning with the Connected Chemistry (CC1) Curriculum: Navigating the Complexities of the Particulate World,” J. Sci. Educ. Technol., vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 243–254, 2009, doi: 10.1007/s10956-009-9145-7.
M. Frailich, M. Kesner, and A. Hofstein, “Enhancing Students’ Understanding of the Concept of Chemical Bonding by Using Activities Provided on an Interactive Website,” J. Res. Sci. Teach., vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 289–310, 2009, doi: 10.1002/tea.20278.
M. Akçay?r and G. Akçay?r, “Advantages and Challenges Associated with Augmented Reality for Education: A Systematic Review of the Literature,” Educ. Res. Rev., vol. 20, pp. 1–11, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2016.11.002.
B. Means, Y. Toyama, R. Murphy, and M. Baki, “The Effectiveness of Online and Blended Learning: A Meta-Analysis of the Empirical Literature,” Teach. Coll. Rec., vol. 115, no. 3, pp. 1–47, 2013, doi: 10.1177/016146811311500307.
Z. Tatli and A. Ayas, “Effect of a Virtual Chemistry Laboratory on Students’ Achievement,” J. Educ. Technol. Soc., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 159–170, 2013, [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.16.1.159
